hey 

four-toed-creed:

I’m a history major and to help me with school this year I’m making a history blog to document interesting things in order to help me remember stuff. So follow along with me!

(via four-toed-creed)

buildabitchworkshop:

god sent us steve carell

(via dearatlcountmein)

officeconfessions:

Happy Birthday to the world’s best boss, Michael Scott, aka Steve Carell. 

Are you really going to apply for work at Scranton Breadworks?

(via hemingwayslemonade)

bigsky-mt:

Hillary Clinton: Hard Choices

Read More

I’m a history major and to help me with school this year I’m making a history blog to document interesting things in order to help me remember stuff. So follow along with me!

I have never understood the concept of infatuation. It has always been my understanding that being ‘infatuated’ with someone means you think you are in love, but you’re actually not; infatuation is supposedly just a foolish, fleeting feeling. But if being ‘in love’ is an abstract notion, and it’s not tangible, and there is no way to physically prove it to anyone else. Well, how is being in love any different than having an infatuation? They’re both human constructions. If you think you’re in love with someone and you feel like you’re in love with someone, then you obviously are; thinking and feeling is the sum total of what love is. Why do we feel an obligation to certify emotions with some kind of retrospective, self-imposed authenticity?
Chuck Klosterman  (via your-haircutman)